This might be the most helpful meme I have created.
Here are two answers to get you through life.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2bd80/2bd80451e29e4b62e1e15b8fd189ba9ad565afcd" alt=""
The Weekly Francis is a compilation of the Holy Father’s writings, speeches, etc which I also cross-post at Jimmy Akin’s blog.
This version of The Weekly Francis covers material released in the last week from 22 August 2021 to 15 September 2021.
Angelus
Homily
Message
Prayers
Speech
Tweet
Papal Instagram
A man I went through CHRP with passed away this week.
This photo of Roger Schockling was taken this year with him holding a hardcover copy of the book he wrote on his wife Karen, who passed away in 2011. He was an electrical engineer, manager, and active farmer but would also write for our Parish magazine. He had been in my parish for a number of years and was active as a lector and member of the choir until recently.
I knew him as an unassuming man and one who was a faithful Catholic throughout his life. A man who never missed a Sunday Mass, even when he was stationed in Japan as a young man. I had not known that he had cancer for the last couple of years. But, he was certainly not a man to complain. I am grateful to have known him through our time in CHRP, our get-togethers afterward, and as part of Bible study.
Requiescite in pace
Update: Just having come back from his funeral I am even more amazed about this man from the stories I heard. Truly a man who gave of himself for the sake of others and not his own aggrandizement.
The Weekly Francis is a compilation of the Holy Father’s writings, speeches, etc which I also cross-post at Jimmy Akin’s blog.
This version of The Weekly Francis covers material released in the last week from 1 September 2021 to 8 September 2021.
Angelus
General Audience
Message
Speech
Tweet
Papal Instagram
This version of The Weekly Francis covers material released in the last week from 29 July 2021 to 1 September 2021.
The Weekly Francis is a compilation of the Holy Father’s writings, speeches, etc which I also post at Jimmy Akin’s blog.
Angelus
General Audiences
Messages
Speeches
Papal Tweets
Papal Instagram
Yesterday on social media I had posted:
Sometimes I have a great biting comment as a pun that works on several levels.
I then realize that there is no way my conscience would let me actually post it for its lack of charity. But such a great biting pun.
I will remind Jesus of those occasions when I die. He will probably remind me of the ones I let fly.
Today I was thinking about this quote from Chesterton:
“It may seem a singular observation to say that we are not generous enough to write great satire. This, however, is approximately a very accurate way of describing the case. To write great satire, to attack a man so that he feels the attack and half acknowledges its justice, it is necessary to have a certain intellectual magnanimity which realizes the merits of the opponent as well as his defects. This is, indeed, only another way of putting the simple truth that in order to attack an army we must know not only its weak points, but also its strong points. England in the present season and spirit fails in satire for the same simple reason that it fails in war: it despises the enemy.” – “Pope and the art of satire”
Twelve Types 1903
In reaction to this, I think, that if you use humor to attack, it should be too wound so as to heal. Oddly I think of St. John of the Cross’s metaphor of the “sweet cautery” that he uses in Stanza 2 of the “Living Flame of Love” for the Holy Spirit. That there is pain involved in the cautery, but it is used to heal.
Chesterton way of explaining the use of satire is not an exclusive way at looking at the subject. Still, all satire should be written to persuade if it is going to be effective. Some writers have the skills to do this in a more brutal way such as Swift’s “A Modest Proposal”.
Coincidentally, today I listened to two podcasts that both dealt with the subject of humor – linked in the comment section.
Godsplaining Episode 108: Is Joking a Sin? – YouTube
Uncommon Sense #58 – The Importance of Humor wit David Deavel – YouTube
This version of The Weekly Francis covers material released in the last week from 13 August 2021 to 25 August 2021.
The Weekly Francis is a compilation of the Holy Father’s writings, speeches, etc which I also post at Jimmy Akin’s blog.
Angelus
General Audiences
Messages
Papal Tweets
Papal Instagram
At the Chesterton Conference in Chicago, I heard Crystal Downing speak about Dorothy L. Sayers being influenced by G.K. Chesterton. Sayers credited Chesterton for saving her from logical positivism and the path she might have chosen instead.
“When Chesterton died in 1936, Sayers wrote his widow that ”G. K.’s books have become more a part of my mental make-up than those of any writer you could name.“ And she makes clear that it wasn’t simply Orthodoxy that kept her from giving up on orthodoxy, explaining the importance of Chesterton’s novel The Napoleon of Notting Hill, which she read ”at a very impressionable age.”
I was introduced to Dorothy Sayers books as a teenager via Masterpiece Theater when they did the Lord Peter Whimsey novel “The Nine Tailors.” I knew nothing about her other than I liked these novels. Much later, I started to learn more about her. Mainly in connection with all the authors of that era, I was coming to love. So I decided to pick up Crystal Downing’s book on Sayers called “Subversive.” This book concentrates on her dealing with culture when writing on Christ. The plays she wrote for the BBC on Christianity were not something she sought out, but they affected her with the research involved and how to portray the stories.
“When someone asked her opinion about the evangelistic possibilities of religious drama, she replied by emphasizing the need to place artistic quality first and foremost: ”Piety and a spirit of prayer will not turn a bad play into a good one.“ No matter how sincere the intention that generated it or how orthodox the theology within it, ”bad art is a thing damned in itself and damning in its effects.“
There are several reasons Sayers felt so passionately about this issue. First of all, evangelism through the arts can reek too much of an economy of exchange, turning creation into a utilitarian enterprise. As far as she was concerned, writing to generate converts, though noble in sentiment, is not that different in practice from writing to get wealth or fame in exchange. As she told one popular Christian writer, ”You must not accept money, you must not accept applause, you must not accept a ‘following,’ you must not accept even the assurance that you’re doing good as an excuse for writing anything but the thing you want to say.
She also resisted the call from her friend C.S. Lewis to write a series of books “on Christian knowledge” that might edify “young people” still in school.
I enjoyed this book and the concerns that Sayers had when addressing the secular culture and her concerns regarding fellow Christians, and the tendency to make the faith a safe thing that did not have to be thought through. Reading this, I also thought how her approach to presenting these plays reminded me of Flannery O’Connor.
I especially found delightful that during here adolescent period when she felt totally non-religious how the creativity of Chesterton broke through. When her parents tried to persuade her from Chesterton’s quirky novels towards his works like Orthodoxy, Sayers responded with:
“I am not surprised to hear that Chesterton is a Christian. I expect, though, that he is a very cheerful one, and rather original in his views, eh?”
“Subversive”
I recommend this book highly as there is a lot to think over and the concerns Sayers had are even more prevalent.
My only quibble is that when Crystal Downing brings up Reformation-era controversies, they are not fleshed out very well and tend towards typical misunderstandings and oversimplifications.