The Mystery of Predestination: According to Scripture, the Church, and St Thomas Aquinas written by John Salza was recently released by Tan books. I wanted to review this book because this is a subject I had of which I have never read of specifically in depth. The subject of Predestination if often seen as a subject mostly weighed in on by Protestants, though predestination is specifically mentioned in scripture and has been addressed over time by various counsels. I was previously aware that the two major schools of thought regarding predestination in Catholics theology circles was the Thomist and Molinists views. The argument did get rather heated at one time until I believe the Pope told them to basically “chill out.” So there is no official teaching of the Church in regards predestination other than ruling out some aspects of the subject such as double-predestination as taught by Calvin where some are predestined to Hell. So currently the Thomist, Molinist, or some composite of the two are acceptable views for Catholics to prudentially hold.
I find myself more sympathetic toward the Thomist view and the author of this book argues from the Thomist view. This is not the easiest of subjects and there is a very good reason the word mystery really comes into play when discussing it. As with all mysteries it certainly does not mean we can know nothing on the subject, only that we can never fully understand it. This book though certainly helped me to come to a better understanding of the subject and especially the terminology involved with in discussing predestination. It might seem like a rather esoteric topic, but I think everyone can benefit by more deeply comprehending God’s will towards us in light of salvation and how to some extent his grace works in our life. There is certainly a lot to reflect on here. I know at one time I was actually vain enough to believe that I had read myself into the Church – that by devouring the library in regards to religion that I was just guided by my intellect to discern the truth that lead me into the Catholic Church. Kind of forgot about the fact that I can do nothing without God.
I thought the John Scalzi did a good job of explaining predestination and spent considerable effort on the basics fo the subject along with explaining the Thomist, Molinist views along with the Protestant views on predestination such as exposed by Calvinism and Arminianism. There is a good amount of repetition in this book in the concepts covered, though I think this was necessary in a difficult subject. I thought it aptly reinforced the content.
I did find it rather odd that one of the main foils the author used in espousing the Thomist view was to show them in contrast to the works of Fr. William Most. For those who don’t know, the late Fr. Most was a very solid Scripture Scholar and Theologian and one of whose books I have benefited from. I knew that Fr. Most tried to bring the Thomist and Molinist views together with his own presentation, but I had not read his book on the subject. John Salzi certainly takes issue with Fr. Most’s view on the subject and especially Fr. Most’s understanding of the Thomist view. The views of Fr. Most that the author points out certainly do seem at time to be in conflict with the thoughts of earlier councils. Though it is hard for an armchair theologian and all around amateur on the subject to be able to say if Fr. Most’s views were presented accurately. I can say that the author makes his case very well.
The subject of Calvinism is naturally also covered and contrasted with the Thomist view and a wealth of scriptural evidence is used to show the many problems with the Calvinist view apart from just double-predestination. I found these parts of the book to be very informative with a lot of good questions raised. In fact mostly I really enjoyed this book, though it makes for slow and careful reading. It is certainly not Predestination for Dummies, but the author does a good job of explaining what predestination is along with drawing evidence from scripture and tradition in support of his position.
I have heard good things from solid Catholics about some of this authors other books on Masonry and Purgatory, but as far as I know he also holds to geocentricism which raises some warning bells with me. That though is the only real caveat that I would have and as far as I could tell he presented the Thomist view accurately. Patrick Madrid wrote a blurb favorable for this book so I would trust that the content does not go against Church teaching.
Moving on to lighter reading. Paul: Tarsus to Redemption (Volume 1) is a new Graphic Novel on the Life of St. Paul. Matthew Salisbury a graduate of John Paul the Great University teemed up with with illustrator Sean Lam to tell the story of St. Paul in Manga format. Using comics to tell the truth of the faith has a good amount of modern history behind it and this continues in that tradition using the Japanese style. Now I have have never read any Manga directly though have been introduced to the drawing style via Animé I was introduced to via Adult Swim, but I do have a cat named after a character in Inuyasha. This graphic novel certainly uses the Manga style to good effect and I certainly enjoyed the illustrations used as the story is told. I really wished it had been inked, but the black and white drawings are fairly effective.
Mostly I really enjoyed this retelling of the conversion of Saul to St. Paul and what is to be the first chapter of this story told with further chapters in the future. The story follows Saul apparently some time after the Martyrdom of St. Stephen up to his escape from Damascus. There are some extra-biblical story elements such as a friend of Sauls who is a gentile convert to Judaism and works with him to persecute the Christians. The story mostly follows the events in the book of Acts and in some ways breathes some life into St. Paul as a younger man that you don’t normally see. I have to admit that I was disappointed that the Martyrdom of St. Stephen was not included since it really presents the introduction of the pre-conversion St. Paul in the scriptures and to my mind the perfect starting point. As a tool to introduce a certain audience to the life of St. Paul I feel this Graphic Novel mostly succeeds, but the presentation could be improved on. There were certainly no serious defects that would keep me from recommending it and I do look forward to more in this series and the other subjects they plan to use the same treatment with. You can see some samples of the contents here.
7 comments
All you need to know:
Molina was a Jesuit. 😉
I’ve always been fascinated by predestination, and it was a major interest of mine during my early days of converting to the Roman Catholic Faith. I’ve briefly read some of St. Thomas Aquina’s work on the subject.
The Protestant model just never resonated with me. I always felt that if you extended their logic, you’d end up with folks ‘pre-destined’ to hell, and that doesn’t jive with a merciful God.
Ultimately, free will plays an enormous role in personal salvation. Now, God…in His Omnipotence…knows the final destination of all Creation. For humans, this is a difficult concept to comprehend…but I always reflect on the epilogue of ‘Hostage to the devil’ by Father Malachi Martin. He believed that God’s complete foreknowledge of all future things is able to take into account the infinite possibilities posed by Man’s Free Will. Put another way, God created all the boundaries by which Creation can/will/does unfold.
Lastly, as long as Man draws breath, he always has the ability to serve God willingly or not. The evil one may tempt, but the reprobate angels are bound by a spiritual law that they may not directly interfere with Man’s Free Will.
I guess for most humans, the practical reality/mystery of Pre-Destination is somewhat impenetrable, but ‘may’ be worthy of study, as long as one is not guided by a sort of vain curiosity.
There’s a useful (gently pro-Molinist) summary of the contrast of the Thomist and Molinist positions in the online Cath. Encycl. article “Free Will”.
You might want to copy your review into the Amazon site as there is no review there yet.
Also, you might want to notify the (re-) publisher of the book you review, Tan, a struggling outfit that indirectly supports Catholic orthodoxy and tradition, that Amazon (which you link) is underselling their own site. But, I guess, who knows about the book business?
In the Cath. Enc. article, in the aforementioned section, there appears the word (italicized) “corcursus”. I think it’s a misprint, nothing comes from google or online Lewis & Short. Do you, or does anyone else, have any idea what might be meant here?
Finally, the magisterial meetings of the Pope and Bishops are “councils”, not “counsels”, as, I guess, you know because by your second reference, you found the right spelling. It’s always been an interesting word, other homonyms are “console” (furniture) and consul (like Caesar). I think there’s a gold piece with such a name as well.
Jester, You might want to try reading THOMAS AQUINAS ON THE JEWS by Fr. Stephen C. Boguslawski, O.P.; especially chapters 4 & 5. Also, you might try reading Aquinas’ Commentary on Romans (especially 9-11) which is available online.
Fr. Dismas, careful, the Jesuit’s might start calling you Father Dis.
On Paul, our daughter was disappointed that it didn’t stick with the true Japanese style (back to front-right to left). It seems that there are many who opt to do this American style. I personally liked the way it read regularly, but I am not a Manga consumer as she is.
Nice post Jeff, even though I’m a Fr. Most fan. 🙁
The problem is that Thomism proposes Negative Reprobation i.e. God chooses some whom he will effectively exclude from salvation without prevision of their merits. That is horribly close to Calvinist Double Predestination. In fact, the ‘end result’ is the same: the unconditional damnation (whether this involves freewill or not) by God of an unknown number of people.
This then puts doubt on the sincerity of God’s desire to save sinners and ultimately on the goodness of God Himself. Can we truly love such a capricious God as He is depicted by the Thomist theory of predestination?