I must admit it is nice to hear the President of Planned Parenthood complain about the Bishops. That finally the Bishops are seen by them as the kids in Scooby Doo – “Those meddling Bishops.” Plus the other voices angry at the Bishops for actually proclaiming the truth and defending the unborn.
Now I think the Stupak-Pitts Amendment is mostly political theatre since it can be done away with in reconciliation with the Senate bill or plenty of other political ploys. But still the vote was important and at every step of the way we must work to defend life, even if our efforts might be done away with at a later time. We can never stop doing what is right. Though the reaction is rather strange. Anger at the amendment of the bill that was not suppose to fund abortion in it any way. The normal two faces of politicians were once again asserting two things 1) This bill does not fund abortion 2) The Amendment goes to far in not allowing funding of abortion.
It is not surprising that the defenders of the Culture of Death are upset by any restriction on abortion in the health care plan. So of course the Democratic Party must bow to their masters and respond.
President Obama said today that Congress needs to change abortion-related language in the health care bill passed by the House of Representatives this weekend.
“I laid out a very simple principle, which is this is a health care bill, not an abortion bill,” Obama said. “And we’re not looking to change what is the principle that has been in place for a very long time, which is federal dollars are not used to subsidize abortions.”
Saying the bill cannot change the status quo regarding the ban on federally funded abortions, the president said, “There are strong feelings on both sides” about an amendment passed Saturday and added to the legislation, “and what that tells me is that there needs to be some more work before we get to the point where we’re not changing the status quo.”… [reference]
What? Oh wait the translation says “I oppose the Stupak-Pitts amendment because it does exactly what I said I wanted.” Yes the President that promised the Pope to reduce abortions and said “his” health care bill would not fund abortions is beholden to his masters at Planned Parenthood and NARAL to act.
Obama told… Tapper that he was confident that the final legislation will ensure that “neither side feels that it’s being betrayed.”
This is a step down for the President to go from messiah to Solomon. Sorry you can not both please God and Satan and you cannot please both sides of the abortion debate. Though there is a parallel with Solomon. Solomon said he would split the baby in two. In this debate there is one side that has no problem with splitting the baby in two or for that matter a hundred pieces. And there is a side who would protect the baby. Once again we know which side is telling the truth.
10 comments
As a resident of Maryland’s 8th District, I am absolutely convinced that I will not feel betrayed by the final legislation.
That said, a difference between President Obama and Solomon is that the king would not have actually cut the baby in half.
“Obama […] was confident that the final legislation will ensure that ‘neither side feels that it’s being betrayed.'”
That’s ominous. One can be betrayed without FEELING betrayed.
“Sorry you can not both please God and Satan and you cannot please both sides of the abortion debate.”
(But our politicians will continue to try!)
“Sorry you can not both please God and Satan and you cannot please both sides of the abortion debate.”
(But our politicians will continue to try!)
Yeah, that’s right! The Bishops say, “Not one cent for abortion. Billions for sodomized alter boys.”
With all due respect, reddog, that is an incredibly stupid comment. And perhaps you could learn how to spell “altar.”
You can’t have it both ways Mr. President. You either defend life or you don’t. It’s not about language, it’s about life!
You can’t have it both ways Mr. President. You either defend life or you don’t. It’s not about language, it’s about life!
But reddog is an admitted sociopath who has no personal objection to sodomization of minors. In fact, he was convicted of lewd and lascivious acts with a minor in 1979. Hmmm…
http://www.splendoroftruth.com is very informative. The article is very professionally written. I enjoy reading http://www.splendoroftruth.com every day.