Dear Father Jenkins,
When you informed me in December 2008 that I had been selected to receive Notre Dame’s Laetare Medal, I was profoundly moved. I treasure the memory of receiving an honorary degree from Notre Dame in 1996, and I have always felt honored that the commencement speech I gave that year was included in the anthology of Notre Dame’s most memorable commencement speeches. So I immediately began working on an acceptance speech that I hoped would be worthy of the occasion, of the honor of the medal, and of your students and faculty.
Last month, when you called to tell me that the commencement speech was to be given by President Obama, I mentioned to you that I would have to rewrite my speech. Over the ensuing weeks, the task that once seemed so delightful has been complicated by a number of factors.
First, as a longtime consultant to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, I could not help but be dismayed by the news that Notre Dame also planned to award the president an honorary degree. This, as you must know, was in disregard of the U.S. bishops’ express request of 2004 that Catholic institutions “should not honor those who act in defiance of our fundamental moral principles†and that such persons, should not be given awards, honors or platforms which would suggest support for their actions.” That request, which in no way seeks to control or interfere with an institution’s freedom to invite and engage in serious debate with whomever it wishes, seems to me so reasonable that I am at a loss to understand why a Catholic university should disrespect it.
Then I learned that “talking points” issued by Notre Dame in response to widespread criticism of its decision included two statements implying that my acceptance speech would somehow balance the event: …
Good for her. The fact that they were using this as cover is certainly a good reason to take this step. Previously Bishop John D’Arcy had asked her to accept this and to use it as a opportunity of teaching. Though I am sure the Bishop understands her decision.
Now it will be interesting to see if Notre Dame decides to award this to someone else or to just not issue it this year. I think they would have a hard time finding somebody authentically pro-life that would accept this as she has declined it. So I would guess that it is not issued this year. It would add another scandal if they picked someone nominally pro-life as they did last year with Martin Sheen. I protested his pick last year since while he calls himself pro-life he does nothing to advance the cause and solidly supports pro-abortion Democrats. So will they be calling Doug Kmiec? — I hope not.
Update: The following statement from Rev. John I. Jenkins, C.S.C., president of the University of Notre Dame, is in response to the decision by Mary Ann Glendon to decline acceptance of the University’s Laetare Medal:
“We are, of course, disappointed that Professor Glendon has made this decision. It is our intention to award the Laetare Medal to another deserving recipient, and we will make that announcement as soon as possible.
Update: “President Obama is disappointed by former Ambassador Mary Glendon’s decision,” said spokeswoman Jennifer Psaki, “but he looks forward to delivering an inclusive and respectful speech at the Notre Dame graduation, a school with a rich history of fostering the exchange of ideas. While he is honored to have the support of millions of people of all faiths, he does not govern with the expectation that everyone sees eye to eye with him on every position, and the spirit of debate and healthy disagreement on important issues is part of what he loves about this country.” [reference]
Inclusive except of course for the millions of children who have been murdered and can’t hear his “inclusive and respectful” speech.
14 comments
I made a previous comment on this blog that accurately pointed out that Mary Ann Glendon has never had any qualms about working in a pro-choice environment at Harvard which has a womens health center on campus.
The comment was censored. That’s nice. Wow….you guys really believe in free speech and free debate.
Now I know how the sexual abuse victims at the hands of the Catholic church felt when they tried to speak out.
It looks they will:
“We are, of course, disappointed that Professor Glendon has made this decision. It is our intention to award the Laetare Medal to another deserving recipient, and we will make that announcement as soon as possible.”
Shameless.
My short list of possible alternative recipients (excluding people whom I expect would decline the medal under the current circumstances):
Vice President Joe Biden
Speaker Nancy Pelosi
Senator Edward Kennedy
Senator John Kerry
Professor Douglas Kmiec
Nicholas Cafardi
Morning’s Minion
Whoever they get, it’s going to be ugly.
Since he’s already there, just hand it to Obama.
Eww. He couldn’t have just said, “Sorry to hear that Professor Glendon.” He intends to award it to “another deserving recipient”? How does that not look like scratching off Mary Ann Glendon’s name and INSERT YOUR NAME HERE-ish.
Classy.
Prof. Glendon’s refusal has been done with grace, respect and humility. We, all, can learn a lot from her magnificent action. By contrast, the curtness of Fr. Jenkin’s reply says one thing: brat.
Where’s a good tornado when you need it? (oops – not very charitable, but that was my first thought.)
I would like to see every single previous medal recipient and honorary scholarship recipient return their awards. As they mean nothing now that Rev. Jenkins has tarnished their intended purpose.
Please give these people the courage and inspiration to do so!
Is it just me or does Obama’s press release sound a tad familiar to something he’s said when the ND scandal first broke?
What class Mary Ann has!!! A true role model for my girls.
he looks forward to delivering an inclusive and respectful speech
Is he really going to respectfully talk about including lots of, um, demographics in, um, whatever, or is this one of those times when someone uses catchphrases to remind everybody of whose agenda they should be promoting?
I have a hard enough time finding the inevitable sports analogy relevant. Even aside from the grave moral issues I’d feel a little condescended to by these faux kindergarten sentiments.
Man, I’m testy today.
“he looks forward to delivering an inclusive and respectful speech”
The first thought that came to mind was “teleprompter, teleprompter, teleprompter…”
Man, Notre Dame must be getting REALLY desperate:
http://southbend.craigslist.org/evg/1143896969.html
Garry Wills
Mario Cuomo
Richard McBrien
Rosemary Radford Ruether
Helen Prejean
The short list grows. Really, the ’68-ers must be ringing Fr. Jenkins’ phone off the hook: what a chance for a last hurrah. Only a world-class narcissist could step into the spot Prof. Glendon has rendered so hot simply by vacating it. What’s the smart money say?
Mike, what’s your problem with Sr. Helen?
Really, you guys are creating a tempest in a teapot.
Instead of focusing on the speakers, why don’t you focus on the students? After all, this is THEIR graduation. I don’t even remember who spoke at my college graduation. At least, at Notre Dame, the speaker will be memorable.
Mary Ann Glendon Rocks! ND Bites! I’m surprised more pro-life Catholics aren’t returning their medals–who would want anything from a school who is so obviously disrespectful of life!!!