An interview with Rev. John Jenkins President of Notre Dame introduces some unintentional hilarity mixed with some wisdom. Regarding the Pope he says:
He is a person who could easily hold an endowed chair at Notre Dame."
Wow, imagine that. Maybe a corner office next to Dicky McBrien and tickets each year for the Vagina Monologue. Though the interview improves with:
Asked to speculate on what Pope Benedict might say, Father Jenkins tells me, "The greatest respect we can show him is to let him speak and then reflect." But the president, who himself has a doctorate in philosophy from Oxford, says that the pope is "a subtle thinker [who] doesn’t think in slogans." Father Jenkins is worried that "people with various interests will pick out a line or a phrase," and misunderstand the pope’s message.
But then deteriorates when he says:
"The Newman society has no ecclesiastical standing and no academic standing," Father Jenkins says. "For me, it resembles nothing more than a political action committee."
While certainly these points are true, the real question is whether the Cardinal Newman Society is right in their critique or not and not their ecclesiastical or academic standing.
In 1990, Pope John Paul II issued Ex Corde Ecclesiae, an encyclical whose provisions included a requirement that theologians teaching at Catholic schools receive a stamp of approval from the church (a "mandatum"), and that the campus environment should be supportive of a Catholic way of life.
Father Jenkins calls Ex Corde a "superb document" that he has read "many times." But most Catholic college leaders, including Father Jenkins, have not implemented it to the extent that they or others expected they would have to. The mandatum provision, for instance, was met at the time with outrage by college faculty and administrators, who found it to be an infringement on academic freedom. But since then, Father Jenkins explains, "positions softened a bit on that. Misunderstandings were eliminated."
The way the mandatum controversy was resolved is this: Local bishops give their approval to some theologians and not others. But no one besides the bishop and the theologian knows who has it. So Father Jenkins can claim total ignorance about which members of his own theology department are approved by the church.
Surely he must have a small statue of those famous monkeys on his desk. "See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil." Or possible Sergeant Shultz has been appointed as the universities president "I see nothing!"
Other intellectual battles seem to have been resolved in the university’s favor as well. Despite the Vatican’s clear condemnation of liberation theology, a Marxist approach to Christianity, the doctrine is still proudly taught at Notre Dame.
Father Jenkins says the situation is not so clear cut: "Liberation theology is a label for a family of views and concerns . . . [a set of] theological reflections in light of certain social and economic conditions." In other words, no violent revolutionaries here.
Despite the large presence of liberal faculty members, Father Jenkins complains that in some circles, the school is not considered radical enough. People on the left say that "we’re too tied to the Republican party. We don’t advocate enough for women’s ordination. You name the socially divisive issue and we’re criticized that we’re not on the front on [it]." And it is true that on the spectrum of Catholic universities, Notre Dame is considered somewhat middle of the road – still less radical than its Jesuit brethren like Georgetown, Fordham and Boston College.
While I think Notre Dame is moving in a positive direction, it often seems that this is largely the result of the students and not the faculty.
11 comments
I concur that the faithful direction is coming for the students and the deliberate and public disobedience of Fr. Jenkins to the bishop of hte diocese in the matter of the vulgar play shows how far they have to go. And there is the continuous flow of dissenting trash from Fr. McBrien too.
Does anyone know if Father McBrien has offered or even assisted at the Traditional Latin Mass at St Charles Borromeo Chapel in Alumni Hall?
Typical pose of the dissenter: complain that one is criticized from both the Right and Left and then declare oneself “middle-of-the-road”…as if the truth of the faith is always “somewhere in-between.”
Fr. Philip, OP
1) Cdl. Newmann (ironically in this case) showed the error of a Via Media.
2) Attend the Eucharistic Procession on Sunday the 20th at ND’s campus.
2008 NCAA MEN’S HOCKEY NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP
BOSTON COLLEGE 4 – NOTRE DAME 1
Suck on it, Jenkins!
Totally inappropriate, Thomas.
Rooted for Notre Dame, huh, Nathan?
“The way the mandatum controversy was resolved is this: Local bishops give their approval to some theologians and not others. But no one besides the bishop and the theologian knows who has it.”
Then what does is the point of the “secret” mandatum? Isn’t it supposed to be to allow the faithful to know if a theologian is worthy of a hearing? Would Fr. Jenkins go to a doctor whose license to practice was a secret between the doctor and the state? or higher an accountant whose certification was a secret?
Secondly, it’s really bad when a priest and the head of a university views the Church through lens of liberal/conservative secular politics! What a way to strip the Church of Her supernatural identity!
Boston College wins thats ok, its a win here in the temporal world. We here at ND win because we are humble.
Happy though to see our team make it so far, esp that I’m designing an arena for hockey at ND for my thesis.
On to relevant things… McBrien? Latin? HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAH
The students are pushing the orthodoxy on this campus, but with the help of many good faculty. Lets not forget Alister MacIntyre is here as well. He had a great talk last week. about the nature of the university and research institutions. By all reports, as I didnt make it, it was a repudiation of universities as research institutes, and it was an affirmation of a college as a place to teach. I guess he too is at loggerheads with Jenkins, who expressed desire to become a great research university.
For those who don’t read the entire interview, a little historical context is apropos. Card. Ratzinger was offered a position decades ago by Fr. Hesburgh, though I am sure that it was offered with the knowledge that he was not going to accept….
Unfortunately a lot of the ND-related blog posts are a broken record. But, unfortunately, that’s probably because the university continues to do things that deserve ridicule or legitimate criticism. Fr. Jenkins has simply not been a strong voice for moving the school in a different direction. He may be successful in his more understated but crucially important efforts–particularly hiring more Catholic faculty. But I have not seen him as a strong voice in the right direction.
Go (or send your kids) to study architecture, philosophy, or law. Otherwise, look closely and use prudential judgment. Those coming in with a reasonably strong faith can find a great deal of support and an excellent Catholic community. And, for better or worse, you get plenty of opportunity for engaging an imperfect culture.
For what seems like the millionth time, Richard McBrien spends more time on ABC News than in a classroom, and no one I have ever spoken with has ever even heard of him celebrating a Mass anywhere since I was a freshman.
Where were all these people coming out of the woodworks to bash Notre Dame years ago when matters were ten times worse but less entrenched? It seems that everyone wants to attack us (in a manner that will in no way benefit the University but seems to only suggest that Catholics abandon it) only now that there is actually a real movement to improve things.
The full article did neglect one major source of the positive direction: The Congregation of Holy Cross. The priests there, especially the young, are by and large solid, as are the seminarians.
Comments are closed.