Articles are marking the rounds from
various news sources about Bishop Gianfranco Girotti, head of the
Apostolic Penitentiary, week-long Lenten seminar for priests that
included talks on confession and mortal sins. The news
agencies are casting this as a new list of the seven deadly sins even
though it is no such thing.
Different news agencies choose their
emphasis such as the Telegraph choose to headline that not recycling is
a mortal sin and the Times says new deadly sins include “Sins Including
Abortion, Contraception and Drug-Dealing.” This is of course quite
silly and religion reporting is notoriously bad and British religious
reporting even worse. “Ruining the environment” is not the
same thing as not recycling and of course abortion, contraception, etc
are not new sins
The last line of the article said:
Eastern Catholics do not recognize
the same distinction between mortal and venial sins as the Western or
Latin Church does, nor do they believe that those people who die in a
state of sin are condemned to automatic damnation.
Now I understand the theology of
Eastern Catholics churches and
Orthodox Churches don’t use those words to make distinctions in sins,
but the last line about ‘automatic damnation” seems to be quite off to
me in relation to Easter Catholic churches since obviously the same
Catechism applies to the whole Church and it is Canon Law and some
differences in emphasis in regard to theology that mark this.
Now the Wikipedia article on this makes the same claim so I
would bet that this is where the article picked it up and in fact it
looks to me that much of the article was lifted from Wikipedia.
So if
any of my readers could clear this up I would be interested in how
accurate this is.
Zadok the Roman also
posts on this and wonders “Is it ignorance or malice that’s
responsible for the poor standard of religious reporting?” How about
both/and?
11 comments
I think reporters just don’t really know what they are talking about. Religion matters like these are usually stuck back towards the end of the paper, unless it is amazing and sensationalist, and dealing with the Templars. So these reporters are just basing everything on the ludicrous assumption that the Church must be ignorant and backwards, some kind of holdover from the dark ages. And they must derive some satisfaction at pointing this out in extravagant ways. They know not what they do, BUT they like doing it.
It’s confusing non-biased reporting with uneducated reporting.
Man, I sure hope Pope Benedict clarifies this. This story is stirring up a hornet nest of Catholic bashing at any web site that it is reported. And I must admit I agree with the notion that these so-called new mortal sins seem to be leftist jargon for the already existing seven deadly sins (i.e. avarice = extreme wealth, etc.).
My husband was listening to an NPR report where they commented on some of the “incomprehensible” references that Mike Huckabee was making. THey were all Bible references, of course, and they weren’t esoteric things. They were statements like “let he who is without sin cast the first stone” or references to David and Goliath.
And yet the reporters admitted that in the press rooms, no one could come up with background for these esoteric statements. (I mean, really, who’s heard of David and Goliath? Oh, wait, it’s part of the larger culture.)
We’re not talking about references to Zerubabel or Keziah. 🙂
So I agree about the both/and part. They’re not interested in informing themselves because they don’t want to be. The first definition that fits their preconceived notions is the one that goes into print.
Imagine what the reporting will be like when Pope Benedict comes to America, talks to President Bush, and addresses the UN.
Cdl. Stafford is head of the Apostolic Penitentiary, or so I thought.
Ignorance is bliss, to many of the reporters.
Sloth may have something to do with it as well.
“Imagine what the reporting will be like when Pope Benedict comes to America, talks to President Bush, and addresses the UN.”
I remember when JPII went to Cuba. I was watching on CNN and hearing what the Pope was saying in Spanish. The CNN English voiceover was pathetically incorrect and misleading with regards to what the Pope was saying.
The Wikipedia article for “sin” states:
“However, like the Eastern and Oriental Orthodox, the Eastern Catholic Churches do make a distinction between sins that are serious enough to bar one from Holy Communion (and must be confessed before receiving once again) and those which are not sufficiently serious to do so. In this respect, the Eastern Tradition is similar to the Western, but the Eastern Churches do not consider death in such a state to automatically mean damnation to Hell.”
Neither does the Western Catholic Church; for a sin to be “mortal” there must be 1. grave matter, 2.full knowledge of the evil, 3. full consent of the will (Catechism 1857-1859). Therefore, it all depends on what the words “in such a state”(i.e. all 3 conditions fulfilled) mean in this Wikipedia entry.
The Catholic Church, Eastern or Western, does not judge the damnation of human beings on an “automatic” basis, but both parts of the Church teach that grave sin will send a soul to hell…as does the Orthodox Church.
The quote from the newspaper article, however, says something different: “nor do they believe that those people who die in a state of sin are condemned to automatic damnation.”
Well this is also true for ALL Catholics (and Orthodox.) Many, or most, people die in SOME state of sin, which is one of the reasons we pray for the dead. Dying in “mortal” or “serious” sin is another, specific matter.
The Wikipedia article seems to downplay and mislead the reader about the importance of serious sins in the view of Eastern Christians, simply because there has not been as much emphasis on differentiating “lists” in the East, as there has been in the West.
In the Byzantine tradition, on the 2nd Sunday of Lent, we sing: “Today the time of earthly deeds is revealed, for judgment is at hand….let us bring tears of supplication, begging mercy and crying out: “I have sinned more times than there are sands of the sea; but forgive me, O Creator of All, that I may receive the crown that does not perish.”
We’ve been on the case for this one, too.
http://asksistermarymartha.blogspot.com/2008/03/new-deadly-sins.html
Comments are closed.