The Washington Post has an article on a church actually called "Inclusive Community" which contains Catholic priests who left to marry and other cultural Catholics who don’t like the baggage of Christ’s actual teachings. As is usually the case the word inclusive can easily be substituted for liberal. Their views are never inclusive enough to believe all that the magisterium of the Church teaches is true. To not deny any teachings of the faith would be inclusive, once you start snipping some of you become exclusive by the very act of excluding them.
She grew up Roman Catholic, but like millions of others, Rebecca Ortelli came to disagree with church teachings on contraception, communion and priestly celibacy, among other things.
Many Catholics drift away from the church or join other denominations. But Ortelli, 57, wanted to maintain both her Catholic identity and her worldview. And she didn’t want to feel one was inconsistent with the other.
So 20 years ago, she did what a small number of defiant Catholics are doing. She joined a church with many lifelong Catholics of similar views, a church that borrows heavily from Catholic rituals even though it’s not part of a Catholic diocese.
"I don’t think I should have to give up my Catholicism. That’s part of who I am. It makes me who I choose to be," said Ortelli, whose church, in Nutley, N.J., is called the Inclusive Community. "I like some of the rituals that we have. They’re important."
The cultural Catholic phenomenon is kind of like the Urban Cowboy one. People dressing up in Cowboy hats and boots who have never ridden a horse or lived on a ranch. That by performing some rituals or putting on a cowboy hat you can call yourself either a Catholic or a cowboy. In some ways this shows the power of rituals and how they shape us, but rituals ripped from their context and roots become pretty empty and devoid an any real meaning. This might explain why their services receive a whopping 15 members.
8 comments
“Inclusive” = exclusive of orthodoxy.
Just because you can call yourself Superman doesn’t mean you can fly.
“Inclusive” generally means “exclusive of anything that requires me to believe or behave in a way contrary to my immediate impulses.” This always excludes the truth of the faith and always allows one to act on impulse w/o moral consequence…NOT w/o actual consequence, mind you.
Fr. Philip, OP
“To not deny any teachings of the faith would be inclusive, once you start snipping some of you become exclusive by the very act of excluding them.”
A silly, pathetic attempt at defending your narrow minded God. I’m far more inclusive than he. I welcome everyone, excepting saints and the Irish.
So, if there’s only 15 people at the service and it’s in East Bumbershoot, New Jersey, why do you think the Washington Post wants to tell us all about it?
I don’t know about you, but I worship the God of the Jews.
I have no idea who this God of Inclusiveness is. Whoever he is, he sounds like a real bore at parties.
Wait… 15 people? I thought the article implied “millions”. Silly Washington Post, tricks are for kids.
Hmm..a band of raving Formal Heretics. Who says there is no need for the Inquistion anymore.
But really they are no different than the leaders of the Protestant Rebellion, (I didn’t say Reformation because they didn’t reform the church, the church reformed its self) of 1517.
“To not deny any teachings of the faith would be inclusive, once you start snipping some of you become exclusive by the very act of excluding them.”
I disagree with Satan (Thank God). 🙂 Jester, this sentence is brilliant!
Comments are closed.