Your Eminence:
I noticed this paragraph in your most recent homily, published in the National Catholic Reporter:
I think of World War II as an example where our church failed in the face of a tyranny and an evil that was unbelievably evil — the Nazi tyranny. The church in Germany failed to speak a prophetic word to that tyranny. Why? Because they had entered into an agreement with the Nazi dictatorship in 1933. Hitler would allow the church to have its schools if the bishops of the church would agree they would not allow their priests to preach any so-called political message. And so the Church became virtually silent during those years. There were a few exceptions — a peasant in Austria, Franz Jägerstätter, and a few others like him said, “No! I won’t serve in Hitler’s army,” and he was executed. A whole group of young people connected with the universities called the White Rose group — the same thing — they spoke the truth; most of them were executed. The church refused to listen. It was more concerned about its institutional structures than about God’s Word. So we failed.
While the behavior of Church leadership regarding the Shoah is a worthy topic of discussion (count me as one who thinks more could have been done), I find your criticism to be ironic, given your own track record.
Just what explains your consistent refusal "to speak a prophetic word" to the tyrannies you have visited in "solidarity" during your lifetime (e.g., Castro’s Cuba, Hussein’s Iraq, Aristide’s Haiti, Arafat’s Palestine)? I’m also coming up empty looking for examples of "prophetic words" spoken by yourself to the Soviet Union, so any insight you could provide on that would be welcome.
Beams, specks and all that.
Sincerely,
Dale Price
Dale once again nails it. Now on the positive side Bishop Gumbleton has spoken out about Darfur, Sudan, but his "prophetic voice" let him down when it came to Rwanda. Mainly it is just those lovable tinpot dictators that the left so loves or are at least willing to give them a pass. Robert Mugabe for example can continue to be safely ignored while his policies cause starvation and he builds torture training camps in which youth are trained to both torture and kill. My suggestion to anybody who wants to get on the dictator career track just make sure you shout socialist bromides and you are sure to be ignored or even better sanitized by the world press and the peace movement.
7 comments
Since Gumbleton isn’t a Cardinal (gratias Deo!), shouldn’t he be addressed as “Your Excellency,” not “Your Eminence”?
Gerald over at “The Cafeteria is Closed” also has a great response to this one here.
-El S.
It’s interesting how those with no sense of history other than facts filtered by their person agenda regularly chastise the Church for not having prophetic knowledge of the future.
Hitler became Chancellor of Germany in 1933. He had done nothing yet. Was the Church to declare war on him then? Kristalnacht [“The night of broken glass”], the first big attack on the Jews did not happen until November 9, 1938.
“Mit Brennender Sorge” [“With Burning Sorrow”], Pius XI’s major condemnation of the Nazis came on March 14, 1937, nearly two years earlier.
What, if anything, has his excellency had to say on the holocaust taking place within our borders? I can’t him saying anything about abortion.
A concise summary of Church in Germany during the Nazi era can be found here.
An excerpt:
Faulhaber, undeterred, pressed on with denunciations of Nazi policy on Catholic schools, youth organisations, rigged elections, sterilisation laws, attacks on the Pope and attempts to replace Christianity with what he called �ersatz� (fake) religious principles. He played a considerable role in the writing of the great anti-Nazi encyclical Mit brennender Sorge (�With Burning Anxiety�) issued in March 1937. It denounced repeated attacks on the Catholic faith, the breaking of almost every article of the 1933 Concordat, and assailed Nazi ideology and political practice. The encyclical was smuggled into Germany under the eyes of Gestapo agents who had received warnings from Berlin to expect an important anti-Nazi pamphlet. Copies were secretly printed in various parts of the country and the underground Catholic network was engaged in distributing it to parishes throughout Germany. Hundreds of helpers, in cars, on motorbikes or bicycles, handed copies personally to priests, sometimes in the dead of night. The encyclical made it plain that the Nazis were intent on a �war of extermination� against the Catholic Church, and that after numerous rebuffs to diplomatic approaches from Rome, the Pope had decided to make a final stand.
The government reaction to the encyclical was immediate. A formal protest was sent from Berlin to Rome, and equally swiftly rejected by Cardinal Pacelli. An enraged Hitler and Goebbels cranked up the propaganda machine and once more dozens of clerics found themselves arraigned on the hoary old charges of immorality and �slandering� the Nazi state. Gestapo units were mobilised to find which presses had produced the encyclical: 12 were confiscated and the editors arrested. In one parish, Essen in the diocese of Oldenburg, seven girls were arrested inside the church as they handed out copies of Mit brennender Sorge after the Palm Sunday service.
Your Excellency is the correct way to address a bishop.
Good eye Publius.
I thought his excellency retired? And as someone from the Detroit area who is very familiar with this publicity hound what can we do?
Comments are closed.