In an article critiquing the "male spirituality" of Fr. Rohr written by Fr. Bryce Sibley (ex-blogger at A Saintly Salmagundi): [Via RC at Catholic Light]
At the conference I explained to another attendee that I did not think Rohr should call his "male spirituality" Catholic. This individual responded that I was being too rigid in my interpretation of Catholicism, that Rohr just has a very "broad" sense of what it means to be Catholic. To which I posed this situation in reply: Imagine that you, a Cajun, traveled to some state in the Midwest and went to a restaurant advertising that it sold "Cajun food" and you ordered a bowl of gumbo. But what was brought out to you was a bowl of watery soup with a few pieces of steak floating in it. Would you call that authentic "Cajun food"? Of course not. No Cajun in his right mind would. Then why would you be more dogmatic in your approach to food than in your approach to your faith?
I think I have heard Fr. Sibley using that comparison before, but I still love it.
Fr. Sibley critique of Fr. Rohr is quite good and it seems that Fr. Rohr has fallen into the same mistake of others. That the example of a good father in someone’s life means that they will thus be totally unresponsive to God as father. Scott Hahn ran into this same concept where he was asked to tone down his speaking of God as father when speaking to kids from broken families. The opposite is what is true is that when we lack this example of earthly fatherhood that we need to see the perfection on which it is based.
6 comments
I’m probably just slow, but… if we really do have crisis of the “Father Wound,” particularly among young American men, how is imaging God as Mother going to fix that?!?? Aside from being bad theology, it just seems like really broken psychology. Men still need fathers, even if their biological ones sucked. Trying to substitute in a mother just won’t do the trick.
When I came back to the Church, I had some trouble with the concept of God as Father. I didn’t get on particularly well with my own father, and the idea was a very tense one. I did better by thinking of God as the best sort of commanding officer: just, patient, honorable, omniscient and omnipotent, expecting the best from me but correcting me without rancor when I fail.
Yes, I too have heard of others not liking the concept of father or mother due to unfortunate childhoods. I heard a priest say to the congregation, when addressing this topic, that God is like the father you always wanted…and He will never let you down, nor will He ever leave you or harm you. I guess it helped the others. AS for me, having lost both of my parents, knowing that God and Our Blessed Mother are their for me at all times is very comforting. We are His children first. For some reason that is soothing. It’s the other kids on the playground I have a hard time with somedays! 🙂
Eat fish–ELY
Hmmmm, not discounting anyone else’s experience but, if God is the “Father you always wanted”, I have to ask, who the hell wants a father who’s presence to you is most often completely indistinguishable from His absence?
I guess you can count me among those who have a problem with God as a model of Fatherhood. If men fathered their children the way God fathers his, they’d be in a prison or in the morgue. I have to think God’s fatherhood is totally different from ours; that is, at least, if I don’t want to hate him.
Well, that’s the thing. People have different gifts and different ways of looking at the world. There are plenty of people who do not find God’s presence indistinguishable from His absence; who feel His presence and His work going on all around them almost all the time. (This sort of person often gets mad at God, but never doubts His existence.)
But it is equally true that there are many people who do not have this instinct, and there are others who start with such a feeling, but then lose it somewhere along the line. These groups of people also require pastoral care, and should not be ignored.
But mostly, we call God our Father because Jesus told us to. That doesn’t mean that’s the only thing we can call Him, of course, but it does mean it’s an important Name.
I like the bit in St. Cyril of Jerusalem’s Catechetical Lectures where he points out that God, in allowing us to be called the Faithful, is allowing us to be called by one of His Names.
Check out our gumball vending machines http://gumball-machines.blog-city.com/
Comments are closed.