A couple of days ago I saw the story of a campaign to rehabilitate Judas making the news and doing the rounds in St. Blogs. I didn’t comment on it since I figure I would only have to wait a couple of days to find out it was nonsense. Sure enough.
Just as I thought
previous post
4 comments
Thanks Jeff. E-mailed Amy and Mark. Us Chiefs know what and how to get our work done.
Tom Sanko HMC
Old Navy 51-71
thanks, made the change to my site as well!
Padre
What makes you think that it was false? It was reported on Spirit Daily, who have not refuted the Story, and is still being discussed in Parishes and in sermons.
Unless the UK Times issues a recant, how can you say this is false, unless you are embarrassed that the humanistic nature that one is not responsible for ones own sins that is being perpetuated these past 40 years is not what is being resonating out of the church
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,13509-1981591,00.html
Europe
The Times January 12, 2006
Judas the Misunderstood
FROM RICHARD OWEN, IN ROME
Vatican moves to clear reviled disciple�s name
JUDAS ISCARIOT, the disciple who betrayed Jesus with a kiss, is to be given a makeover by Vatican scholars.
The proposed �rehabilitation� of the man who was paid 30 pieces of silver to identify Jesus to Roman soldiers in the Garden of Gethsemane, comes on the ground that he was not deliberately evil, but was just �fulfilling his part in God�s plan�.
Christians have traditionally blamed Judas for aiding and abetting the Crucifixion, and his name is synonymous with treachery. According to St Luke, Judas was �possessed by Satan�.
Now, a campaign led by Monsignor Walter Brandmuller, head of the Pontifical Committee for Historical Science, is aimed at persuading believers to look kindly at a man reviled for 2,000 years.
Mgr Brandmuller told fellow scholars it was time for a �re-reading� of the Judas story. He is supported by Vittorio Messori, a prominent Catholic writer close to both Pope Benedict XVI and the late John Paul II.
Signor Messori said that the rehabilitation of Judas would �resolve the problem of an apparent lack of mercy by Jesus toward one of his closest collaborators�.
He told La Stampa that there was a Christian tradition that held that Judas was forgiven by Jesus and ordered to purify himself with �spiritual exercises� in the desert.
In scholarly circles, it has long been unfashionable to demonise Judas and Catholics in Britain are likely to welcome Judas�s rehabilitation.
Father Allen Morris, Christian Life and Worship secretary for the Catholic Bishops of England and Wales, said: �If Christ died for all � is it possible that Judas too was redeemed through the Master he betrayed?� The �rehabilitation� of Judas could help the Pope�s drive to improve Christian-Jewish relations, which he has made a priority of his pontificate.
Some Bible experts say Judas was �a victim of a theological libel which helped to create anti Semitism� by forming an image of him as a �sinister villain� prepared to betray for money.
In many medieval plays and paintings Judas is portrayed with a hooked nose and exaggerated Semitic features. In Dante�s Inferno, Judas is relegated to the lowest pits of Hell, where he is devoured by a three-headed demon.
The move to clear Judas�s name coincides with plans to publish the alleged Gospel of Judas for the first time in English, German and French. Though not written by Judas, it is said to reflect the belief among early Christians � now gaining ground in the Vatican � that in betraying Christ Judas was fulfilling a divine mission, which led to the arrest and Crucifixion of Jesus and hence to man�s salvation.
Mgr Brandmuller said that he expected �no new historical evidence� from the supposed gospel, which had been excluded from the canon of accepted Scripture.
But it could �serve to reconstruct the events and context of Christ�s teachings as they were seen by the early Christians�. This included that Jesus had always preached �forgiveness for one�s enemies�.
Some Vatican scholars have expressed concern over the reconsideration of Judas. Monsignor Giovanni D�Ercole, a Vatican theologian, said it was �dangerous to re-evaulate Judas and muddy the Gospel accounts by reference to apocryphal writings. This can only create confusion in believers.� The Gospels tell how Judas later returned the 30 pieces of silver � his �blood money� � and h anged himself, or according to the Acts of the Apostles, �fell headlong and burst open so that all his entrails burst out�.
Page 1 || Page 2
It was also reported at Cath News:
http://www.cathnews.com/news/601/40.php
And at Ekklesia:
http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/content/news_syndication/article_060112judas.shtml
One has to wonder about the deafening silence coming from the Vatican on this one.