Via Roman Catholic Blog comes this statement originally from the Diocese of Brooklyn’s ecumenical office.
"To embrace and learn from the differences between us, rather than reconcile them, gives each of us a new understanding of conversion. Rather than seeking to change the faith of others, we hope that through dialogue our own hearts and minds can be changed, allowing us to see new images of God, new glimpses of Truth."
The problem with statements like these is that they have a degree of truth in them that gets subverted by a larger falsehood. It is certainly true that all religions have some degree of truth in them and that other faiths can at times help us to see those truths that already part of our faith more clearly. But this false view of ecumenism where we will be more affected by the other than the other by us is just plain mistaken. If we truly love our neighbor as we love ourselves we want the same good for our neighbor as we do four ourselves. A relationship directed at us getting more out if it than the other is inverted. This is not the intent, but this becomes the reality of it. Our hearts should be burning with the desire that we all be one as regards to Jesus’ high priestly prayer. To have the sacraments, and especially the Eucharist, and not have an evangelical zeal that your brothers can enter into a real communion with Christ’s Church is less than charitable. This false ecumenism is more about just getting along than sharing the truth. True ecumenism requires that we share the Catholic faith as best we can and also that we truly understand the theology of others. This allows us to plainly see where there are both agreements and disagreements and allows us a foundation on which to build on. False ecumenism pretends that there are not substantial differences and in the end truth doesn’t really matter as long as we just get along. Jesus allowed some of his disciples to walk away when it came to the hard truth of the Eucharist in John 6. We must preach the truth with clarity and charity.
Here is something by the late Fr. Hardon, S.J. on ecumenism.
Since the close of the Second Vatican Council, many Catholics have sincerely initiated relationships with the churches separated from Rome without taking into full account the doctrinal foundations on which true ecumenism must be based. True ecumenism is the Christian unity that Christ Himself revealed. It is the unity which is not merely verbal but real. It is the unity which preserves all the essential elements of faith and morality prescribed by the Savior for those who are to be His followers in truth and not only in name.
True unity necessarily requires a clear and deep understanding of the premises of belief and practice required by the founder of the Church who died on the Cross because He refused to compromise with the truth. True unity is certainly animated by a deep Christian love. But this love must be founded on the truth which the Roman Catholic Church has preserved for twenty centuries and for which millions of her followers have shed their blood.
True unity is impossible without union with the Bishop of Rome, the successor of Peter on whom Christ promised to build His Church.
7 comments
I have heard this sentiment coming from some Catholics for a while now and on numerous occassions. This shouldn’t be a shock … look at all the unity in diversity expressed at some Catholic retreat houses … ahh, I mean ashrams. Basically, it has left me a bit confused on what is happening w/the “ecumenical” dialogues.
I did run across a “dialogue” paper which might give a hint … It is posted on the Lifwynn Foundation website which also states:
” …. A crucial aspect of the “I” is its assumption of the rightness of its beliefs. Due to inherent factors and the process of socialization, there arise in each child precepts of “right” and “wrong” that are not supported by verifiable experience. Certain beliefs and values become a central feature of one�s identity: I belong to the only true Church; I belong to a superior race, … “I know the right way to raise children; … The “I,” this entity that each individual comes to experience as himself or herself, has assumed an autocratic dictatorship over the attitude …”
On the topic of “dialoguing”
http://www.muc.de/~heuvel/dialogue/dialogue_proposal.html#6
” … The creative potential of Dialogue is great enough to allow a temporary suspension of any of the structures and relationships that go to make up an organization. …”
That objective truth can be confused with subjective experience by grown adults has my generation very worried. No wonder we’re all messed up.
There’s nothing wrong with tabling differences in order to act together on matters of common concern. The page hints that there’s something of that going on.
But, unfortunately, it quickly devolves into indifferentism on stilts. I’m OK, You’re OK meets Veritas? Quid est veritas? Ultimately a self-affirming waste of time and energy.
It always blows my mind (therefore, there ain’t much left of it), when people think that in order to understand and respect the differences in belief between Catholics and non-Catholics–a good and noble endeavor in and of itself–we should back off of our truth claims. It seems to me that, if we believe what the Church teaches about Eucharist, infallibility, and other Catholic distinctives, the most respectful and understanding thing to do is want to share these great gifts. The only thing that needs to be avoided like the plague is arrogant triumphalism–while it’s true that we’re card carrying members in full communion with the one and only true Church, God could raise up card carrying members of the one and only true Church from these stones.
If the last line in my last post reminded anyone of those stupid, sophomoric “dese nuts” jokes, sorry. Anyone who deson’t know what I’m talking about is better off.
The approach favored in the article/quotation fits perfectly with the KiddieKateKism you mentioned (posted in Ten Reasons.)
…and it is slammed, nicely, by Chesterton (who else?) in his remark about the Keys of Peter:
“A key is above all things a thing with a shape. It is a thing that depends entirely upon keeping its shape…the Christian creed is above all things the philosophy of shapes and the enemy of shapelessness.”
It seems to me that there has been a misread of the Ecumenical and Interfaith Commission Web site.
Please know that the goal of ecumenical dialogue (dialogue with other Christians) is to bring about Christian Unity. To accomplish this we must first have mutual understanding, respect, kindness and a welcoming attitude towards each other.
The goal of interfaith dialogue (dialogue with non-Christian religions) is to explore areas where we can enter into a conversation on similar beliefs or similar moral standings. Such conversation can lead us to work for peace and understanding in our neighborhoods, communities, and the world at large.
While the commission does not proselytize, that is, we do not demean other faith traditions or force anyone to accept Catholicism, we do state the faith convictions of the Catholic Church. To comprise on the faith is a disservice to the Church and a deception and disrespectful attitude towards our partner in dialogue. If anyone freely comes forward expressing interest in the Catholic faith we encourage that person to seek proper guidance and also refer the person to someone who can help in the discerning process.
Msgr. Guy Massie
Diocese of Brooklyn