From an article by Mark Shea in the National Catholic Register [Via Diary of a Suburban Priest].
But at the same time, I was aware that, precisely because the media’s portrayals of Pope Benedict were so unrealistic, there was a danger that even the people who were delighted with his election were delighted for unrealistic reasons as well.
The more I listened to Internet chatter, the more it seemed to me that many of his fans assumed he would apply the full might of the papal office to the task of rooting out all the bad Catholics and sending them packing. Depending on their theological perspective, Catholics were filled with hope or fear that he was at long last going to inaugurate the show trials, purges and excommunications.
The Church was about to pass through the Great Benedictine Cleansing Fire!
This seemed to me as wildly unrealistic as the hysterical notions that Benedict was the enemy of democracy who wanted homosexuals stoned to death, women barefoot and pregnant, and Protestants burned at the stake. As the gleeful hope for The Purge continued to rise on one side, I made a prediction on an Internet forum to the effect that, within six months, many of those cheering Benedict’s election would be complaining about his failure to be Der PanzerPapa.
I was wrong. It only took about two weeks.
Internet critics whose sense of failure, doom and despair sustains them through moments of hope and happiness soon began to sniff that, “Many of us have greatly lowered our expectations of this Pope.”
Now as I posted on the day of his election that I was jumping up and down in my living room as I first heard the word Joseph announced. Though I had no expectations of some great purge with massive condemnations, excommunication, and interdicts occurring. Despite the cries of some progressives about the coming inquisition I realized that this was quite silly. I am by no means an expert of then-Cardinal Ratzinger, but I had read many of his books and judging by his leadership as head of the CDF I saw that these nasty stereotypes of him were just plain false. Only after adequate deliberations and plenty of time and in very few circumstances were there people disciplined by the Vatican. The National Catholic Reporter previously published this really short list of of theologians disciplined in the 26 years the Cardinal Ratzinger was the the head of the CDF. It is not that now he is Pope Benedict XVI that he is starting to act more pastorally. The truth is that he has always acted pastorally by both investigating and giving adequate time and opportunity to those being investigated to respond. It would not be very difficult to compile a very large list of of just U.S. theologians. who have wondered into outright heresy.
G.K. Chesterton said "The reformer is always right about what is wrong. He is generally wrong about what is right." I think that Pope Benedict XVI is the rarest of people in that not only does he know what is wrong, he is also right about what needs to be done. Now I am not saying that I know all that needs to be done, I just suspect that he does. He was intimately involved in Vatican II and saw the aftermath of changes made just for change sake (which had nothing to do with the Council) and the effects that they had. I suspect that there are many things liturgically that he would like to change, yet he is not going to make the mistake of rapid change that will further disrupt the liturgy. Even positive changes made all at once can be disruptive and even damaging. Previously reading The Spirit of the Liturgy I read that he favored a return to Ad Orientum, though I would be really surprised (though happily) if he made this change any time soon. He has previously spoken of a reform of the reform and not of a rapid reform of the reform. As a papa he knows his children can only take so much change at a time and will prepare us and prudentially make those changes. The changes will be way to slow for the impatient ones (such as myself), but we must realize that we are not a Church of individuals to be satisfied but the Mystical Body of Christ that must be shepherded to as to lead the whole flock.
8 comments
No! Panzerpope will slay the heretics!
The right man in the right job for the right time. That, in a nutshell, is what Benedict XVI is.
I was a Ratzinger supporter and as Pope Benedict XVI, I am not at all disappointed in him.
He is a wonderful, gentle and very saintly man who does indeed carry a heavy burden at this time.
I pray for him daily – just as he asked us all to do in his inaugural homily.
When John Paul died, I thought who will they elect. I knew who I wanted~ Ratzinger, but all the press poopoo’s him being elected. When Ratzinger was announced as our new Pope I cried. God is good and knows what, and who we need to lead us. Praise God he chose Benedict XVI. We knew he would have some big shoes to fill, but this is a man that won’t disappoint us.
I know I’m too eager for an immediate good purging of the Church. I know it takes time–and in God’s time… but, still… *sigh* one does dream.
The election of Benedict XVI (check)
The nomination of John Bolton as U.S. ambassador to the U.N. (check)
Now, Supreme Court Justice, let’s see…
maybe we have to bring back a rootin’ tootin’ Judge Roy Bean.
Or better still, are any of those youngsters from Ave Marie ready for the bench yet?
Mark Shea is too eager to rail against what he deems are “Faithful Conservative Catholics[TM].” Yeah, there may be some who are already upset with Benedict, it’s not as though everywhere you turn in the Catholic blogosphere are railing against the Pope. It’s just not happening.
Will
This is true. I myself have wondered why he devotes so much time to condemning a wing of the Church, which according to him, defends torture and the killing of the unarmed, and ridicules the Pope and Cardinals for daring to have anything to say about the war. Such a wing, if it exists, cannot be so big or widespread that it necessitates so much of his attention. The fact that Joseph D’Hippolito is the one he most often refers to suggests that perhaps this wing is, after all, pretty juch confined to Joseph D’Hippolito. Maybe one or two others, but I just didn’t see a burgeoning number of people specifially defending torture on the grounds that enemy did even worse things.
But I think he is right at least on this one. Maybe there aren’t as many now, in his “two week” status report, but at the six month mark, there may very well be a lot more.
The “reform of the reform” of Liturgy will begin at the Synod on the Eucharist (with earlier stirrings clearly marked in Redemptionis Sacramentum…
This effort will last a lot longer than making Iraq into a democracy…there are far too many Bishops and priests (just in the USA) who will actively and passively resist.
On the other hand, it’s possible that the Pope will create an Inquistion sub-office within CDW. Ordering a few hundred cords of wood for this Office will draw some attention…
Comments are closed.