Aristotle A. Esguerra of Confessions of a Recovering Choir Director has saved me the trouble by intelligently fisking an article about Fr. Jan Michael Joncas’ plenum address on differences of musical style.
Update: Due to a misspelling in my title (which I will leave as is) Alicia ask "is the word ‘impoverising’ a cross between improvising and impoverishing? If so, brilliant!" Unfortunately I can’t claim credit for the slip, but I like Alicia’s interpretation as directed towards the liturgy and ‘Impoverising’ is a good word-merge to describe it.
9 comments
is the word ‘impoverising’ a cross between improvising and impoverishing? If so, brilliant!
Actually, especially given the release of the Fantastic 4 movie, I’d say the title’s neologism evokes more of a blend of “pulverize” and “impoverish.”
Just wondering: according to the good Father, would rap be ok?
Using a broad definition of rap, most Masses are “rap masses”.
Of course, “rap masses” come without the turntables, clever rhymes, percussive/syncopated delivery, bling-bling, and shouting into the microphone generally associated with rap. 🙂
My absolute favorite Joncas quote:
“I�m pleased to note that no songs of mine ran through my mind during my illness; that would just have increased the torture!”
Source
You heard it here: If you’re forced to sing “On Eagles Wings” tomorrow, call Amnesty International!
Indeed, your “impoverising” is excellent. Lewis Carroll called these “portmanteau” words – “two meanings packed up into one word” – like “slithy” in the “Jabberwocky” poem in his Through the Looking Glass.
These fortuitous typos can be amusing, and even GKC observed them 99 years ago:
When I was a very young journalist I used to be irritated at a peculiar habit of printers, a habit which most persons of a tendency similar to mine have probably noticed also. It goes along ith the fixed belief of printers that to be a Rationalist is the same thing as to be a Nationalist. I mean the printer’s tendency to turn the word “cosmic” into the word “comic.” It annoyed me at the time. But since then I have come to the conclusion that the printers were right. The democracy is always right. Whatever is cosmic is comic.
[GKC, ILN June 9, 1906 CW27:206]
Not “On Eagles’ Wings” again! AARGGHH!
But is his claim accurate / true? “Style doesn’t matter, only the words.” Huh?
Psalm 24 a la’ Scott Joplin (ragtime)strikes me as rather distracting, to exaggerate for effect. An older friend of mine calls much of the liturgical music we hear these days “git-along songs” or “camp songs.” I’m not convinced that certain melodies / genres of song aren’t better than others, in terms of conveying and illuminating not only the (good)lyrics, but perhaps also the truth into our hearts via non-rational routes.
Imho. 😉
I once ast through a “folk mass” where the communion “song” was Eric Clapton’s ballad to his son (can’t remember what it’s called now, but he wrote it after his sone died) and the line “I know I don’t belong here in heaven”. I tackled the priest about it after mass and he justified it’s use because “it’s a nice tune and people like it”. Well in that case any chance I can have “Bring your daughter to the slaughter” by Iron Maiden as I’m a bit of a fan?
No seriously, the debate over music is a valid one because it opens up a number of issues relating to what is, or is not, sacred and therefore appropriate. I once attended a “youth (pronounced yoof)” mass where the creed was replaced with a pseduo-humanist agenda where the only passing reference to God was an acknowledgement of belief in ” ..a spirit of consciousness that energises the whole creation..”. If that’s the case (and that’s what we were supposed to believe), then I might as well have been at a Quaker gathering.