One of the challenges in being a Christian is to work on not jumping to conclusions about a person’s motives. To try to assign a more charitable reason for a perceived failure. I have written in the past about liturgical abuses and how it has dumbfounded me as to how the obvious rubrics in the GIRM can be totally ignored and substituted with someone own preferences. I was inclined to think the worse of those who do change the liturgy to their own liking or point of view. When I served a six month sting as a Navy Recruiter we were told that if someone came into the office and wanted to go into electronics to not focus on this one field until after they have had a physical. The reason for this is that since some people have color blindness this would make it difficult to work in the electronics field. Resistors and some other components are color coded and wiring is done the same way. It was only after they had successfully passed the test for color blindness and had the requisite ASVAB test scores that we would talk to them about the electronics field. This got me wondering if just possibly there might be underlying physical problem or learning disorder leading to liturgical abuse?
The Curt Jester Institute for Liturgical Dysfunction after much research and tests has determined the underlying physical problems that have lead to many liturgical abuses. Rubric comes from the from the Latin rubrica for red which signified the red earth used by carpenters to mark on wood the line to follow in cutting it. Today it seems that some liturgist holding to a meaning that rubric is the mark in the GIRM for cutting out. But the truth is otherwise. Because of the color used for rubrics liturgist who suffer from Liturgical Rubric Color Dyslexia actually not only don’t see the rubrics but see something else entirely.
Liturgical Rubric Color Dyslexia (LRCD):
Example of LRCD
Scripture Readings 34. The readings lay the table of God’s word for the faithful and open up the riches of the Bible to them.[33] Since by tradition the reading of the Scriptures is a ministerial, not a presidential function, it is proper that as a rule a deacon or, in his absence, a priest other than the one presiding read the gospel. A reader proclaims the other readings. In the absence of a deacon or another priest, the celebrant reads the gospel.[34] |
This entry from the GIRM is what most people would see. |
Scripture Readings 34. The readings lay the table of God’s word for the faithful and open up the riches of the Bible to them.[33] Since by tradition the reading of the Scriptures is a ministerial, not a presidential function, it is proper that as a rule a deacon or, in his absence, a priest other than the one presiding read the gospel. A reader proclaims the other readings. In the absence of a deacon or another priest, the celebrant reads the gospel.[34] |
First the Rubric Blindness causes this to happen. |
Scripture Readings The Homily can be given by a priest, deacon, layman, known heretic, or anybody else you might feel appropriate. |
Because of a known optical illusion where the readers eyes try to place information that is not there. The brain tries to fill in the missing piece to give it meaning – Liturgical Dyslexia tries to fill in the missing text according to the readers conceptions. |
Chant Deafness (CD):
This is similar to tone deafness. With Chant Deafness the person not only can’t hear the beauty of chant, but even worse, believes that many hymns found in modern hymnals are beautiful. Those who are tone deaf normally can’t find a job as a choir director. Those that are Chant deaf actually for some unknown reason appear to be predominantly chosen as choir directors. While we should have empathy for those afflicted with such a horrible syndrome – I think equal opportunity for this problems goes to far.
Sign of Peace Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (SOPOCD):
We have all heard of those with OCD that obsessively keep washing their hands over and over. There is a liturgical variant of this syndrome where the priest at Mass can not keep himself from leaving the sanctuary and then shaking the hands of everybody at Mass. Some priests have a milder variant where they can control themselves and only shake the hands of everybody in the front couple of rows.
Reverse Posture Syndrome (RPS):
You might observe someone standing after receiving the Eucharist or sitting during the consecration. People who have RPS automatically choose any posture but the one recommended. Strangely some bishops have even encouraged this disorder.
Levitating Hand Magnetism Syndrome (LHMS):
This seems to be a very common syndrome that infected the populace sometime in the 60s or 70s. People who have LHMS will display the following symptoms. During the Our Father their hands will start to levitate up in the air and then magnetically attach themselves to the hands of someone else with LHSM)
Gender Replacement Syndrome (GRS):
If during a scripture reading or a homily you keep hearing Brothers and Sisters inserted all over the place then this person has GRS. A sure sign that a whole parish is infected with GRS is if you hear the hymn Faith or Our Mothers or any other derivation on that theme. This syndrome is very easy to test in the clinic. You simply ask them to say the word man in a universal context. They are simply unable to do it. Instead you will hear human kind, people, person, or just about anything but the word man. Normally these people can recite any word combinations of the three persons in the Divine Trinity except the words Father and Son.
Smells and Bells Allergy (SBA):
Parishes seemed to have worked overtime to make their churches SBA friendly for those who suffer from this severe allergy. The first waft from a thurible is horrible and can make them break out in a rash – rash judgment. Bell ringing at the consecration, especially if done by an altar boy vice an altar girl, will not only wake them up but causes them to seek an antidote immediately. This allergy seems to be extremely selective and in tests done cowbells, tambourines, their cell phone going off during Mass, wind chimes and other forms of instruments that can chime cause no discomfort, but the slightest ring during the consecration causes major discomfort. Symptoms include guttural muttering about pre-Vatican II and verbal aspirations about traditionalists (said as if it is a swear word. The smell allergy also seems to be highly selective since many subjects followed new age concepts such as aroma therapy and many liturgical practices that don’t pass the smell test they can easily accept.
Loftophobia:
Even in churches with perfectly fine choir lofts singers afflicted with loftophobia have the fear of singing at heights suspended above the back of the church and away from the gaze of the congregation. Those with lofophobia are usually not bothered by crowds since they don’t mind being crowded into a small area in the sanctuary. This phobia seems to have a group dynamic like mass hysteria and is usually known more properly as Mass Entertainment. Those who are afflicted by loftophobia usually also have a form of relevantitis. Another symptom of loftophobia that occurs in choir directors is wandering handitits. This is where the choir director is unable to keeps his hands at their side and they try to direct the audience congregation like an orchestra conductor.
Leotardation:
This extremely strange physical and mental psychosis causes the person to have the urge to dress in leotards and prance around the sanctuary. This is often associated with additionally waving banners, streamers, or other props around in some rhythmic movement. If this is observed do not approach the individual but immediately call your local institute for the liturgically insane.
So I am sure this information will be invaluable in helping you to view people with Liturgical Dysfunctions with more kindness and charity. Please report any other instances of LD to the Curt Jester Institute for Liturgical Dysfunction for further study.
12 comments
BWAHAHAHA!!!
Some of your best work yet!
Great job. 🙂
A commentary, please, on allergies to incense, Dr. Curt Jester.
Andy,
Good idea – I added the research on Smells and Bells allergy.
I have had to leave Mass because of excessive incense, but then I have a good excuse, being pregnant and all. I usually pull up my jacket or a hankie to breathe through, but dang that guy at church was a little too enthusiastic with the censer.
I wish we had the bell ringing. I remember that in my childhood. And I remember crowning Mary when I was 7 (it helps to be named Mary, I can tell you).
I find GRS the most annoying. I’ve had to put up with that a lot in Manhattan.
Dear Dr. Curt Jester,
Sometimes, the mere presence of the thurible can cause such allergies. PLease explain.
Very good. This way of looking at it helps me cope.
Here are a few suggestions:
The disease (you name it) that causes deacons to dress the same way as priests so the laymen can’t tell them apart.
The disease where, when there is a perfectly good choir loft in the back of church, the choir all crowds around at one side of the altar, drinking out of cups of water (hopefully) during mass in front of everyone.
The disease where the people up there on the altar all forget to kneel during the consecration.
Keep up the good work!
Once at Church, the woman on my right had severe LHMS. As a matter of fact, I don’t have LHMS but I think there was a magnet in my side because I felt a WHACK and she inadvertently hit me because of the magnetic force. Who knew?
Why is it that so many folks afflicted with a-rubricism and the other afflictions described (syndromes which usually exist in combination) apparently have a genetic predisposition to become liturgists?
Undoubtedly this puzzling disability accounts for why normal liturgical perception (that they term “rubricism” ) makes them see red.
So far, the syndrome seems resistant to any efforts to treat it.
Nancy,
I implemented on of your suggestions under Loftophobia.
Again, Jeff, EXCELLENT work!!!
I noticed, though, that the “Movement Prayer (Liturgical Dance)” was omitted from the list of disorders…
Have the powers that be decided that this is no longer a “disease” or “disorder” (in a manner similar to the position of the APA regarding homosexuality)?
I just want to be sure I don’t misdiagnose our dancing friends in the sanctuary!
On loftophobia: the choir of which I am a member usually sings from the loft – however in summer it is so hot up there that I come close to passing out, even without the choir robe. And in winter it gets downright arctic up there, even with the choir robe.
When there are only a few of us singing (usually a quartet) we do sing from the front of the church, but we are off to one side next to the wall and hopefully not distracting from the altar.
In a large church, doing music from the loft also has some problems having to do with timing and synchronicity of the organ etc.
What I love are the churches with choir stalls to either side of the sanctuary, facing each other and not the congregation. These work best with masses offered as orientam, I’ve noticed.
Comments are closed.