Episcopalian bishop gets “married” in San Francisco Episcopal church.
A story and picture like this really makes it difficult to try to do parody. How can you compete with something like this?
[Via Mystique et Politique]
Episcopalian bishop gets “married” in San Francisco Episcopal church.
A story and picture like this really makes it difficult to try to do parody. How can you compete with something like this?
[Via Mystique et Politique]
92 comments
Until today, I always said I had never seen an ugly bride.
“How to get a Parental Advisory sticker without swearing…”
Are you a poofter? How wonderful, so am I!
and you people call yourself Christians. For shame, I’ll pray for all your souls this evening.
The flowers and garlic we wear still doesn’t cover up the smell of the things we do behind closed doors.
‘Fear not, till Birnam wood
Do come to Dunsinane
I would say, “Bishop jumps queen,” but I think I might have stolen that from Mark Shea, and it looks like another person had the chess theme in mind; “Bishop, boyfriend get lei’d,” is probably too risque and trite at the same time; “Are you trying to seduce me, Bishop Robinson?” might work; but I think I’m going to have to go with: “Tragic neglect of divine revelation has hilarious side effects.”
Please enjoy these entries:
“Don we now our gay apparel.”
DoubleMint ad campaign alienates midwestern market
Just another typical spring wedding. (NYTimes)
…Seconds before the National Cathedral fell into the earth, engulfed in flames!
…Gay couple seen here, minutes before divorce proceedings.
With their eyes on the consulship, their father Julius new he must adopt his nephew Octavius or Rome would fall.
New PBS kids show launched as spin off from Bannanas in Pajamas–specutlaive title: Fruits in bathrobes.
This couple responded negatively to the Gibson’s Passion when questioned leaving the theater, saying, “we thought it was a different type of movie.”
IT’S THPRING!
You know what, I really don’t understand the need to be so cruel and unfeeling as this. To harbor your own feelings against these men is one thing. To speak against what they believe and the life that they are choosing, and to do it in a civil manner is fine. But to mock them is just truly cruel.
Is mockery some big new Christian movement that I somehow missed in the bible?
Zombyboy,
Yes it is in the Bible between the passages when Jesus called people hypocrites and the times he called them Brood of Vipers.
Zombyboy,
These two old geezers presented themselves in public!, dressed as characatures of 1960’s hippies, one of whom was dressed in Episcopal vestments, to get married (?) by a member of the CLERGY and you can’t see the incredible humor and irony?
The look on the bride’s face (or, the groom’s…the one on the right) is too incredibly funny for words.
Others have covered the more germane serious points, so I feel that has been adressed.
“If it walks like a duck, looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then you got yourself a duck.”
Can you imagine the wedding night: a.) who carried whom across the threshold, b.) was the marriage con……. Oh forget it, the comedy material is endless.
Jeff, Jesus didn’t mock peoples’ lisps or sexual orientation. He didn’t laugh at them for being different. That was condemnation, not mockery and not sarcasm.
And as for the “comedy material”, I’m sorry, but I don’t see it. I know my wedding wasn’t a funny thing to me, and I would be pretty angry if I found a site devoted to making fun of it. Was your wedding a funny thing?
I don’t want to imagine the wedding night for the same reason that I don’t want to imagine yours–that’s utterly personal and private, so let’s leave it there.
You know what, I believe that there are intelligent, reasonable people who are opposed to same sex marriage. But then I read these personal attacks and see this base behavior, and I know for a fact which side of this argument I would rather be on.
“But then I read these personal attacks and see this base behavior, and I know for a fact which side of this argument I would rather be on.”
Dear me, what terribly tender people you must know. You’re confusing dancing-school manners – “If you haven’t anything nice to say, don’t say anything at all” – with Holy Writ. Grim solemnity has far too strong a hold on public discourse as it is: there’s nothing wrong with making jokes as well as arguments. You don’t like it, but then, you don’t have to. You don’t have to like us, either. But you can’t expect us to get all tense and unhappy because you don’t, you know.
Chill out, Zom: can’t you tell that +Otis and Senor Paris have a sense of humor and a sense of human frailty about this? Anybody dressed up like that knows it looks at least a little ridiculous, and when you add in their age and their same-sex-ness, there’s plenty of incongruity going around. Try to enjoy the jokes.
Elinor, I simply expect you to act like Christians–you know, with understanding, caring, tenderness, charity, and love.
I don’t treat everything with “grim solemnity”, but I do take cruelly seriously.
The flowers and garlic we wear still doesn’t cover up the smell of the things we do behind closed doors.
Not only tasteless, but not funny.
“Two of the ugliest lezzies you’ve ever seen getting “hitched” in San Francisco.”
Oh, yes, that’s intelligent commentary.
MPs compelled the prisoners into humiliating and degrading poses, and saved photos of the scenes.
Even if I agree that the two gentlemen would have a sense of humor on this subject, I have a hard time imagining that they would consider their wedding pictures to be humiliating and degrading.
All I’ve seen in response to my remarks is to brush them off or to indulge in self-justification for relentlessly callous behavior.
From here it just sounds bigoted and hateful.
I’m sure I’ve overstayed my welcome, so I’ll back off now. But I would urge you to look at those comments again and consider what you would think if they had been made about your best friend’s wedding. Or, heaven forbid, your own wedding.
Zombyboy …
Well, nobody’s perfect.
(Elinor might be the only one to truly get that)
To be fair, Zom (that was me above on the unsigned comment: my mistake):
A few of the wisecracks people have offered here have been harsh (which is regrettable), and some of them are lame and unfunny (which is inevitable). But do let the commenters make momentary mistakes in judgment without calling them “cruel”, “bigoted”, and “hateful”.
If you’ll read through the wisecracks above, you’ll notice that unlike yourself, most of them didn’t actually accuse other people of malice. That makes your comments seem harsher and angrier than the rest.
Perspective, kid.
Two old queens
Dressed up like some trees
K-I-S-S-I-N-G
First came sodomy
Then a mockery of marriage
And no one’ll be pushing a baby carriage
Grandpa?!
“But I would urge you to look at those comments again and consider what you would think if they had been made about your best friend’s wedding. Or, heaven forbid, your own wedding.”
But thsee comments aren’t being made about a REAL wedding. We’re mocking mockery. Mocking Satan is a good thing.
Attaboy, Victor!
There was nothing about my own wedding which anyone for whose opinion I care a rap would be inclined to laugh: we got married for the first time, forever, with a determination to bring up new souls for God and help each other to Heaven. Somebody might, I suppose, have been amused by a dumpy bride and a groom with a prominent beak, or by the extreme simplicity of the ceremony, but such criticism would be so shallow as to be unworthy of notice. This precious pair is playing dress-up, each having abandoned marriages of which they tired, thus demonstrating in the clearest way that for them a wedding is a social event and not a ritual marking self-dedication to an irrefragible vow. It would almost be wrong not to laugh at it.
“That was sooooo nice this morning. Thank you.”
Pot, meet kettle.
Dear Zombyboy
Just wondering are you gay?
How about: “Sin Made us Stupid”
Okay you get the orange tree but I get the monkey
*Man on Left: “Dear, I’ve read that your style of goatee was all the rage in pre-Abrahamic Gomorrah…”
*Mommy, why are they looking at each other like that?
*Gay marriage: Making sane people throw up since 2004!
*Instructions: If poison has been ingested, display the above picture to the patient to expel any toxic elements.
*EEEEwwww…
Rice throwing unnecessary.
For those who think this is mocking the two gentle brides, let me remind them: they are mocking the ceremony themselves, as is plainly apparent by their attire.
‘you may now give the groom a laurel, and hearty handshake.’
“At the heart of liberty is the right to define ones’ own sense of reality.” Scotty, beam me out of here.
“At the heart of liberty is the right to define one’s own sense of reality.” Scotty, beam me out of here.
Tee hee. You guys are way good.
Hell personified.
Personally I think you are all a bunch of hypocrites who only prove that ‘christians’ are hollow entities using a false idea to make themselves feel superior to others.
***not gay and whatever other argument you people use to make yourselves feel better.
unfortunately neck, you should be asking who the hell are they to think that they are both superior to natural law. Moreover, what sets them apart from others that gives them a right to be superior and marry someone from the same sex?
If you allow your soul to take pleasure in base desire, it will make you the laughingstock of your enemies. Sirach 18:31
Mike, them funny hats?
Zombyboy, you think two old guys with flowerpots on their gourds and evil in their souls is any more tasteful than anything I might say about them? HUH?
Hey, BTW, if you want to talk about taste, have a quick look at your handle, eh? Zombyboy?
Have the “Queer Eye” guys seen this picture? Surely they can’t approve? It is something of a breach in their main selling point – that gays have more taste than the rest of us. Don’t ya think?!
So who won the Caption contest?
Comments are closed.